You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative genomics of the core and accessory genomes of 48 Sinorhizobiumstrains comprising five genospecies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-2-r17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masayuki Sugawara, Brendan Epstein, Brian D Badgley, Tatsuya Unno, Lei Xu, Jennifer Reese, Prasad Gyaneshwar, Roxanne Denny, Joann Mudge, Arvind K Bharti, Andrew D Farmer, Gregory D May, Jimmy E Woodward, Claudine Médigue, David Vallenet, Aurélie Lajus, Zoé Rouy, Betsy Martinez-Vaz, Peter Tiffin, Nevin D Young, Michael J Sadowsky |
| Abstract |
The sinorhizobia are amongst the most well studied members of nitrogen-fixing root nodule bacteria and contribute substantial amounts of fixed nitrogen to the biosphere. While the alfalfa symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti RM 1021 was one of the first rhizobial strains to be completely sequenced, little information is available about the genomes of this large and diverse species group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 55% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 73% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Russia | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 23% |
| Researcher | 42 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 114 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2014.
All research outputs
#2,367,512
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,928
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,796
of 204,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#21
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.