↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of immunohistochemical and qPCR methods from granulomatous dermatitis lesions for detection of leishmania in dogs living in endemic areas: a preliminary study
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13071-022-05218-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilaria Porcellato, Giulia Morganti, Maria Teresa Antognoni, Katarzyna Małgorzata Walczak, Stefano De Arcangeli, Tommaso Furlanello, Cristina Bianca Quattrone, Fabrizia Veronesi, Chiara Brachelente

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Unknown 9 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,653,988
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,847
of 5,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,238
of 442,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#52
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.