You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using electronic medication monitoring to guide differential management of tuberculosis patients at the community level in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-019-4521-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ni Wang, Hui Zhang, Yang Zhou, Hui Jiang, Bing Dai, Miaomiao Sun, Ying Li, Amelia Kinter, Fei Huang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 60 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,538
of 7,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,217
of 352,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#50
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.