↓ Skip to main content

Biopsychosocial care and the physiotherapy encounter: physiotherapists’ accounts of back pain consultations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biopsychosocial care and the physiotherapy encounter: physiotherapists’ accounts of back pain consultations
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Sanders, Nadine E Foster, Annette Bishop, Bie Nio Ong

Abstract

The physiotherapy profession has undergone a paradigmatic shift in recent years, where a 'biopsychosocial' model of care has acquired popularity in response to mounting research evidence indicating better patient outcomes when used alongside traditional physiotherapy. However, research has not examined how this new dimension to traditional physical therapy is implemented within the therapeutic consultation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 282 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 25%
Student > Bachelor 61 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Other 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 98 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 81 28%
Sports and Recreations 12 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 58 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,154,799
of 16,110,448 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#233
of 3,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,285
of 152,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,110,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them