You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Varied distributions of late gadolinium enhancement found among patients meeting cardiovascular magnetic resonance criteria for isolated left ventricular non-compaction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-20 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Junyi Wan, Shihua Zhao, Huaibing Cheng, Minjie Lu, Shiliang Jiang, Gang Yin, Xiaojin Gao, Yuejin Yang |
Abstract |
Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is identified frequently in LVNC. However, the features of this findings are limited. The purpose of the present study was to describe the frequency and distribution of LGE in patients meeting criteria for left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC), as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 50 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 18% |
Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 22% |
Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 71% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Energy | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,064,197
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,160
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,044
of 205,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#22
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.