↓ Skip to main content

Risk of selection bias in randomized trials: further insight

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk of selection bias in randomized trials: further insight
Published in
Trials, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1597-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vance W. Berger

Abstract

The quality of randomization is an under-appreciated facet of trial design. The present piece represents an advance in our collective understanding of how allocation concealment and randomization relate to risk of selection bias in randomized trials, and other measures are also considered. Though the overwhelming majority of the advice given is timely and correct, it is more instructive to focus on the relatively narrow sliver of advice that is incorrect (namely, that trials should not stratify by site, and that unrestricted randomization is a solution to the problem of selection bias), so it is in this context that the comments here must be understood. In no way is this intended to be a rebuttal of the excellent work we have before us. Rather, it is a refinement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 18%
Chemistry 2 7%
Mathematics 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 36%