↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision

Overview of attention for article published in Population Health Metrics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 385)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision
Published in
Population Health Metrics, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12963-016-0080-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J. Morris, Richard G. Wamai, Esther B. Henebeng, Aaron A. R. Tobian, Jeffrey D. Klausner, Joya Banerjee, Catherine A. Hankins

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5.].

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 28%
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 50%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,241,962
of 20,523,918 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#30
of 385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,726
of 290,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,523,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them