↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision

Overview of attention for article published in Population Health Metrics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 394)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision
Published in
Population Health Metrics, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12963-016-0080-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J. Morris, Richard G. Wamai, Esther B. Henebeng, Aaron A. R. Tobian, Jeffrey D. Klausner, Joya Banerjee, Catherine A. Hankins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,715,293
of 23,979,422 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#43
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,380
of 303,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.