↓ Skip to main content

Genotype – environment correlations in corals from the Great Barrier Reef

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomic Data, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 1,204)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genotype – environment correlations in corals from the Great Barrier Reef
Published in
BMC Genomic Data, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-14-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra Lundgren, Juan C Vera, Lesa Peplow, Stephanie Manel, Madeleine JH van Oppen

Abstract

Knowledge of genetic markers that are correlated to stress tolerance may improve spatial mapping of reef vulnerability and can inform restoration efforts, including the choice of genotypes for breeding and reseeding. In this manuscript we present two methods for screening transcriptome data for candidate genetic markers in two reef building corals, Acropora millepora and Pocillopora damicornis (types α and β). In A. millepora, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) were pre-selected by targeting genes believed to be involved in the coral thermal stress responses. In P. damicornis (type α and β), SNPs showing varying allele frequencies between two populations from distinct environments were pre-selected. Allele frequencies at nine, five and eight of the pre-selected SNP loci were correlated against gradients of water clarity and temperature in a large number of populations along the Great Barrier Reef.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 208 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 26%
Researcher 46 21%
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 8 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 49%
Environmental Science 33 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 <1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 38 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#1,803,214
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#39
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,933
of 205,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.