↓ Skip to main content

Nomenclature for renal replacement therapy and blood purification techniques in critically ill patients: practical applications

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nomenclature for renal replacement therapy and blood purification techniques in critically ill patients: practical applications
Published in
Critical Care, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1456-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianluca Villa, Mauro Neri, Rinaldo Bellomo, Jorge Cerda, A. Raffaele De Gaudio, Silvia De Rosa, Francesco Garzotto, Patrick M. Honore, John Kellum, Anna Lorenzin, Didier Payen, Zaccaria Ricci, Sara Samoni, Jean-Louis Vincent, Julia Wendon, Marta Zaccaria, Claudio Ronco, on behalf of the Nomenclature Standardization Initiative (NSI) Alliance

Abstract

This article reports the conclusions of the second part of a consensus expert conference on the nomenclature of renal replacement therapy (RRT) techniques currently utilized to manage acute kidney injury and other organ dysfunction syndromes in critically ill patients. A multidisciplinary approach was taken to achieve harmonization of definitions, components, techniques, and operations of the extracorporeal therapies. The article describes the RRT techniques in detail with the relevant technology, procedures, and phases of treatment and key aspects of volume management/fluid balance in critically ill patients. In addition, the article describes recent developments in other extracorporeal therapies, including therapeutic plasma exchange, multiple organ support therapy, liver support, lung support, and blood purification in sepsis. This is a consensus report on nomenclature harmonization in extracorporeal blood purification therapies, such as hemofiltration, plasma exchange, multiple organ support therapies, and blood purification in sepsis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 210 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 15%
Other 25 12%
Student > Postgraduate 25 12%
Student > Master 17 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 8%
Other 55 26%
Unknown 43 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Engineering 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 54 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,627,027
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,437
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,631
of 327,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#29
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.