You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: the effects of the DDS-1 strain of lactobacillus on symptomatic relief for lactose intolerance - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-016-0199-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael N. Pakdaman, Jay K. Udani, Jhanna Pamela Molina, Michael Shahani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 82% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,193,400
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#720
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,408
of 321,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.