You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire among pregnant women in a Mediterranean area
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-26 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jesús Vioque, Eva-María Navarrete-Muñoz, Daniel Gimenez-Monzó, Manuela García-de-la-Hera, Fernando Granado, Ian S Young, Rosa Ramón, Ferran Ballester, Mario Murcia, Marisa Rebagliato, Carmen Iñiguez, INMA-Valencia Cohort Study |
Abstract |
Studies exploring the role of diet during pregnancy are still scarce, in part due to the complexity of measuring diet and to the lack of valid instruments. The aim of this study was to examine the reproducibility and validity (against biochemical biomarkers) of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in pregnant women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 17% |
Mexico | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 259 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 16% |
Researcher | 38 | 15% |
Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 5% |
Other | 57 | 22% |
Unknown | 48 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 3% |
Other | 46 | 18% |
Unknown | 67 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,097,702
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#312
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,292
of 194,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.