You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nomenclature for renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: basic principles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1489-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mauro Neri, Gianluca Villa, Francesco Garzotto, Sean Bagshaw, Rinaldo Bellomo, Jorge Cerda, Fiorenza Ferrari, Silvia Guggia, Michael Joannidis, John Kellum, Jeong Chul Kim, Ravindra L. Mehta, Zaccaria Ricci, Alberto Trevisani, Silvio Marafon, William R. Clark, Jean-Louis Vincent, Claudio Ronco, on behalf of the Nomenclature Standardization Initiative (NSI) alliance |
| Abstract |
This article reports the conclusions of a consensus expert conference on the basic principles and nomenclature of renal replacement therapy (RRT) currently utilized to manage acute kidney injury (AKI). This multidisciplinary consensus conference discusses common definitions, components, techniques, and operations of the machines and platforms used to deliver extracorporeal therapies, utilizing a "machine-centric" rather than a "patient-centric" approach. We provide a detailed description of the performance characteristics of membranes, filters, transmembrane transport of solutes and fluid, flows, and methods of measurement of delivered treatment, focusing on continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) which are utilized in the management of critically ill patients with AKI. This is a consensus report on nomenclature harmonization for principles of extracorporeal renal replacement therapies. Devices and operations are classified and defined in detail to serve as guidelines for future use of terminology in papers and research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 17% |
| Spain | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Mexico | 3 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
| Nepal | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 17% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 256 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 33 | 13% |
| Researcher | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 24% |
| Unknown | 70 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 133 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 77 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,146,977
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#936
of 6,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,845
of 327,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#22
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.