↓ Skip to main content

Retraction Note: Paediatric Ewing-like sarcoma arising from the cranium – a unique diagnostic challenge

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction Note: Paediatric Ewing-like sarcoma arising from the cranium – a unique diagnostic challenge
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13000-016-0549-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian J. Robertson, Ian J. Robertson, Fadel Bennani, Ronan S. Ryan, Waqar Khan, M. Kevin Barry

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,290,163
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#64
of 1,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,850
of 320,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.