↓ Skip to main content

The landscape of GWAS validation; systematic review identifying 309 validated non-coding variants across 130 human diseases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The landscape of GWAS validation; systematic review identifying 309 validated non-coding variants across 130 human diseases
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12920-022-01216-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ammar J. Alsheikh, Sabrina Wollenhaupt, Emily A. King, Jonas Reeb, Sujana Ghosh, Lindsay R. Stolzenburg, Saleh Tamim, Jozef Lazar, J. Wade Davis, Howard J. Jacob

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Other 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 26 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Unspecified 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 28 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#13,917,593
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#537
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,591
of 438,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#17
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.