You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing NK-92 serial killers: gamma irradiation, CD95/Fas-ligation, and NK or LAK attack limit cytotoxic efficacy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-022-03350-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lydia Navarrete-Galvan, Michael Guglielmo, Judith Cruz Amaya, Julie Smith-Gagen, Vincent C. Lombardi, Rebecca Merica, Dorothy Hudig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,897,330
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,327
of 4,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,512
of 437,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#28
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.