↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy, dose–response, and aerosol delivery of dry powder synthetic lung surfactant treatment in surfactant-deficient rabbits and premature lambs

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy, dose–response, and aerosol delivery of dry powder synthetic lung surfactant treatment in surfactant-deficient rabbits and premature lambs
Published in
Respiratory Research, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12931-022-02007-8
Authors

Frans J. Walther, Alan J. Waring, Monicah Otieno, Robert M. DiBlasi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Professor 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#17,346,343
of 21,468,133 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,295
of 2,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,148
of 340,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,468,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them