You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-022-06016-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandru Marcoci, Ans Vercammen, Martin Bush, Daniel G. Hamilton, Anca Hanea, Victoria Hemming, Bonnie C. Wintle, Mark Burgman, Fiona Fidler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 13 | 37% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 60% |
| Scientists | 12 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 36% |
| Professor | 2 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,061,312
of 24,605,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#108
of 4,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,642
of 434,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#5
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,605,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.