You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In vitro mineral nutrition of Curcuma longa L. affects production of volatile compounds in rhizomes after transfer to the greenhouse
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12870-018-1345-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rabia F. El-Hawaz, Mary H. Grace, Alan Janbey, Mary Ann Lila, Jeffrey W. Adelberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,626,291
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#640
of 3,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,486
of 328,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#14
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,308 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.