You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The first definitive record of the giant larvacean, Bathochordaeus charon, since its original description in 1900 and a range extension to the northeast Pacific Ocean
Marine Biodiversity Records, August 2016
R. E. Sherlock, K. R. Walz, B. H. Robison
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||67%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||13%|
|Student > Master||2||13%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||7||47%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biodiversity Records
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 336,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biodiversity Records
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.