↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization of rheumatic mitral stenosis: findings from three worldwide endemic zones

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization of rheumatic mitral stenosis: findings from three worldwide endemic zones
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12968-022-00853-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahesh K. Vidula, Ziqian Xu, Yuanwei Xu, Abdullah Alturki, Bhavana N. Reddy, Prayaag Kini, Angel L. Alberto-Delgado, Ron Jacob, Tiffany Chen, Victor A. Ferrari, Lilia M. Sierra-Galan, Yucheng Chen, Sanjaya Viswamitra, Yuchi Han

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 23%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Computer Science 2 15%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,644,386
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#207
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,994
of 448,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.