You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A population based survey in Ethiopia using questionnaire as proxy to estimate obstetric fistula prevalence: results from demographic and health survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-10-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sibhatu Biadgilign, Yihunie Lakew, Ayalu A Reda, Kebede Deribe |
| Abstract |
Obstetric Fistula (OF) remains a major public health problem in areas where unattended obstructed labor is common and maternal mortality is high. Obstetric Fistula was able to be prevented, treated and eradicated in high-income countries; however, it still affects many women in low-income countries. To our knowledge, only few studies have described the prevalence and factors associated with Obstetric Fistula in Ethiopia in population-based surveys. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Uganda | 1 | 9% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 223 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 22% |
| Lecturer | 31 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 70 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 76 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2013.
All research outputs
#4,395,960
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#488
of 1,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,071
of 193,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.