↓ Skip to main content

DSM-5: problems and suggestions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Eating Disorders, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DSM-5: problems and suggestions
Published in
Journal of Eating Disorders, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/2050-2974-1-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Birgegård, Gaby Groß, Joakim de Man Lapidoth, Claes Norring

Abstract

The upcoming DSM5 will impact clinical work and research substantially, and we here point to a few problems that may have been overlooked. These concern inconsistencies and lack of clarity, and the future "not elsewhere classified" atypical anorexia nervosa category. We propose solutions in the form of working definitions and operationalizations to facilitate clinical implementation as well as streamline research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,147,386
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#536
of 783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,926
of 193,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.