↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Improving outcomes in total knee arthroplasty—do navigation or customized implants have a role?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Improving outcomes in total knee arthroplasty—do navigation or customized implants have a role?
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13018-016-0453-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew D. Beal, Dimitri Delagrammaticas, David Fitz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,387,502
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#648
of 1,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,353
of 319,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.