You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Challenges and adaptations to public involvement with marginalised groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: commentary with illustrative case studies in the context of patient safety research
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40900-022-00345-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Isabel Adeyemi, Caroline Sanders, Bie Nio Ong, Kelly Howells, Leah Quinlivan, Louise Gorman, Sally Giles, Mat Amp, Elizabeth Monaghan, Sumaira Naseem, Adam Pearson, Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 17 | 57% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 57% |
Scientists | 9 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 30 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 31 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,453,716
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#115
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,517
of 448,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.