You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mailed fecal testing and patient navigation versus usual care to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening and follow-up colonoscopy in rural Medicaid enrollees: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-022-00285-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gloria D. Coronado, Michael C. Leo, Katrina Ramsey, Jennifer Coury, Amanda F. Petrik, Mary Patzel, Erin S. Kenzie, Jamie H. Thompson, Erik Brodt, Raj Mummadi, Nancy Elder, Melinda M. Davis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 33% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 33% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,318,246
of 23,555,482 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#342
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,170
of 443,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,555,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.