↓ Skip to main content

Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to alcohol in Mongolia: a national population-based survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to alcohol in Mongolia: a national population-based survey
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro R Demaio, Otgontuya Dugee, Maximillian de Courten, Ib C Bygbjerg, Palam Enkhtuya, Dan W Meyrowitsch

Abstract

The leading cause of mortality in Mongolia is Non-Communicable Disease. Alcohol is recognised by the World Health Organization as one of the four major disease drivers and so, in order to better understand and triangulate recent national burden-of-disease surveys and to inform policy responses to alcohol consumption in Mongolia, a national Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices survey was conducted. Focusing on Non-Communicable Diseases and their risk factors, this publication explores the alcohol-related findings of this national survey.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 37%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#13,213,894
of 23,622,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,910
of 15,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,946
of 194,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#153
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,622,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.