↓ Skip to main content

A motivational interviewing intervention to PREvent PAssive Smoke Exposure (PREPASE) in children with a high risk of asthma: design of a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A motivational interviewing intervention to PREvent PAssive Smoke Exposure (PREPASE) in children with a high risk of asthma: design of a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sasha G Hutchinson, Ilse Mesters, Gerard van Breukelen, Jean WM Muris, Frans JM Feron, S Katharine Hammond, Constant P van Schayck, Edward Dompeling

Abstract

Especially children at risk for asthma are sensitive to the detrimental health effects of passive smoke (PS) exposure, like respiratory complaints and allergic sensitisation. Therefore, effective prevention of PS exposure in this group of vulnerable children is important. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that an effective intervention program to prevent PS exposure in children is possible by means of a motivational interviewing tailored program with repeated contacts focussing on awareness, knowledge, beliefs (pros/cons), perceived barriers and needs of parents, in combination with feedback about urine cotinine levels of the children. The aim of the PREPASE study is to test the effectiveness of such an intervention program towards eliminating or reducing of PS exposure in children at risk for asthma. This article describes the protocol of the PREPASE study.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 152 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 31%
Psychology 25 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Unspecified 7 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 30 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,658,284
of 13,073,616 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,860
of 8,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,289
of 143,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,073,616 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them