↓ Skip to main content

The effect of statins on testosterone in men and women, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
195 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of statins on testosterone in men and women, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
BMC Medicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

C Mary Schooling, Shiu Lun Au Yeung, Guy Freeman, Benjamin J Cowling

Abstract

Statins are extensively used for cardiovascular disease prevention. Statins reduce mortality rates more than other lipid-modulating drugs, although evidence from randomized controlled trials also suggests that statins unexpectedly increase the risk of diabetes and improve immune function. Physiologically, statins would be expected to lower androgens because statins inhibit production of the substrate for the local synthesis of androgens and statins' pleiotropic effects are somewhat similar to the physiological effects of lowering testosterone, so we hypothesized that statins lower testosterone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 195 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 148 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Other 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#280,105
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#239
of 4,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,720
of 205,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#5
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.