↓ Skip to main content

Population-based evaluation of a suggested anatomic and clinical classification of congenital heart defects based on the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population-based evaluation of a suggested anatomic and clinical classification of congenital heart defects based on the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-6-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucile Houyel, Babak Khoshnood, Robert H Anderson, Nathalie Lelong, Anne-Claire Thieulin, François Goffinet, Damien Bonnet, the EPICARD Study group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,248
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,037
of 144,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.