You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Biology, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7007-11-18 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Miranda Robertson |
Abstract |
First paragraph (this article has no abstract) Why yet another editorial on painless publishing and re-review opt-out? To summarize succinctly in one place all the issues, some quite contentious, that we are aware of in the light of four years' experience with re-review opt-out (originally described in [1] and revisited in [2,3]). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 35% |
Poland | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 47% |
Members of the public | 5 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 11% |
Brazil | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 56% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 89% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |