↓ Skip to main content

Q

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing
Published in
BMC Biology, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-11-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miranda Robertson

Abstract

First paragraph (this article has no abstract) Why yet another editorial on painless publishing and re-review opt-out? To summarize succinctly in one place all the issues, some quite contentious, that we are aware of in the light of four years' experience with re-review opt-out (originally described in [1] and revisited in [2,3]).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 11%
Brazil 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 56%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 89%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%