↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety testing of a COVID-19 era emergency ventilator in a healthy rabbit lung model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biomedical Engineering, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety testing of a COVID-19 era emergency ventilator in a healthy rabbit lung model
Published in
BMC Biomedical Engineering, March 2022
DOI 10.1186/s42490-022-00059-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke A. White, Benjamin S. Maxey, Giovanni F. Solitro, Hidehiro Takei, Steven A. Conrad, J. Steven Alexander

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#19,306,947
of 21,693,385 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biomedical Engineering
#28
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,038
of 341,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biomedical Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,693,385 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them