You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vitro biological effects of two anti-diabetic medicinal plants used in Benin as folk medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-51 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fifa TD Bothon, Eric Debiton, Felicien Avlessi, Christiane Forestier, Jean-Claude Teulade, Dominique KC Sohounhloue |
| Abstract |
Extracts from Polygonum senegalensis (Polygonaceae) and Pseudocedrela kotschyi (Meliaceae) are two important traditionally used medicinal plants in rural Benin to treat many diseases and notably type 2 diabetes. The aim of the study was to investigate the α-glucosidase inhibition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of those plants extract: Polygonum senegalensis leaves, and Pseudocedrela kotschyi root. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iraq | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,331,227
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,496
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,552
of 194,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#50
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.