You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of effective screening strategies for cardiovascular disease prevention in a developing country: using cardiovascular risk-estimation and risk-reduction tools for policy recommendations
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2261-13-10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sharmini Selvarajah, Jamaiyah Haniff, Gurpreet Kaur, Tee Guat Hiong, Adam Bujang, Kee Chee Cheong, Michiel L Bots |
Abstract |
Recent increases in cardiovascular risk-factor prevalences have led to new national policy recommendations of universal screening for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Malaysia. This study assessed whether the current national policy recommendation of universal screening was optimal, by comparing the effectiveness and impact of various cardiovascular screening strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Chile | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 64 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 19% |
Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,746,859
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#734
of 1,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,787
of 193,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,592 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.