You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intracranial bleeding under vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants: results of the RADOA registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurological Research and Practice, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42466-022-00183-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Waltraud Pfeilschifter, Edelgard Lindhoff-Last, Ali Alhashim, Barbara Zydek, Simone Lindau, Stavros Konstantinides, Oliver Grottke, Ulrike Nowak-Göttl, Christian von Heymann, Ingvild Birschmann, Jan Beyer-Westendorf, Patrick Meybohm, Andreas Greinacher, Eva Herrmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Librarian | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,750,494
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#72
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,150
of 442,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.