↓ Skip to main content

Negative pressure technology enhances bone regeneration in rabbit skull defects

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative pressure technology enhances bone regeneration in rabbit skull defects
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yin-gang Zhang, Zhi Yang, Hong Zhang, Miao Liu, Yushen Qiu, Xiong Guo

Abstract

Bone is a slowly regenerating tissue influenced by various physiological processes, including proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis, under the control of growth factors. Shortening this healing time is an important and popular clinical research focus in orthopedics. Negative pressure can stimulate angiogenesis, improve blood circulation, promote granulation tissue growth and accelerate tissue wound healing. We sought to determine whether negative pressure could reduce bone healing time in a rabbit cranial defect model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 14%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,331,227
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,115
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,075
of 194,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#80
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.