You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Learning from COVID-19 related trial adaptations to inform efficient trial design—a sequential mixed methods study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-022-01609-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robin Chatters, Cindy L. Cooper, Alicia O’Cathain, Caroline Murphy, Athene Lane, Katie Sutherland, Christopher Burton, Angela Cape, Louis Tunnicliffe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 71% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,342,393
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#506
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,733
of 450,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#12
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.