You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of Abrus precatorius leaf extracts - an in vitro study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mir Z Gul, Farhan Ahmad, Anand K Kondapi, Insaf A Qureshi, Irfan A Ghazi |
| Abstract |
The use of traditional medicine at the primary health care level is widespread and plant-based treatments are being recommended for curing various diseases by traditional medical practitioners all over the world. The phytochemicals present in the fruits, vegetables and medicinal plants are getting attention day-by-day for their active role in the prevention of several human diseases. Abrus precatorius is a widely distributed tropical medicinal plant with several therapeutic properties. Therefore in the present study, A. precatorius leaf extracts were examined for their antioxidant and cytotoxic properties in vitro in order to discover resources for new lead structures or to improve the traditional medicine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Namibia | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Iraq | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 56 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2013.
All research outputs
#13,147,386
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,441
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,225
of 193,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#36
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.