↓ Skip to main content

The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Published in
Nutrition Journal, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12937-022-00777-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hangkai Huang, Linjie Lu, Yishu Chen, Yan Zeng, Chengfu Xu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 26%
Unspecified 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 22%
Unspecified 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,956,126
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#478
of 1,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,073
of 439,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.