You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-022-00777-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hangkai Huang, Linjie Lu, Yishu Chen, Yan Zeng, Chengfu Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Japan | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| India | 2 | 6% |
| Poland | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,099,816
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#506
of 1,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,626
of 435,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.