↓ Skip to main content

Implementing a knowledge application program for anxiety and depression in community-based primary mental health care: a multiple case study research protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing a knowledge application program for anxiety and depression in community-based primary mental health care: a multiple case study research protocol
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pasquale Roberge, Louise Fournier, Hélène Brouillet, Catherine Hudon, Janie Houle, Martin D Provencher, Jean-Frédéric Lévesque

Abstract

Anxiety and depressive disorders are increasingly recognized as a health care policy priority. Reducing the treatment gap for common mental disorders requires strengthening the quality of primary mental health care. We developed a knowledge application program designed to improve the organization and delivery of care for anxiety and depression in community-based primary mental health care teams in Quebec, Canada. The principal objectives of the study are: to implement and evaluate this evidence-based knowledge application program; to examine the contextual factors associated with the selection of local quality improvement strategies; to explore barriers and facilitators associated with the implementation of local quality improvement plans; and to study the implementation of local quality monitoring strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 129 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 13%
Researcher 13 10%
Librarian 9 7%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 23%
Psychology 28 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Computer Science 6 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,115,243
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,190
of 1,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,344
of 194,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#25
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.