You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gaining the PROMIS perspective from children with nephrotic syndrome: a Midwest pediatric nephrology consortium study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Debbie S Gipson, David T Selewski, Susan F Massengill, Larysa Wickman, Kassandra L Messer, Emily Herreshoff, Corinna Bowers, Maria E Ferris, John D Mahan, Larry A Greenbaum, Jackie MacHardy, Gaurav Kapur, Deepa H Chand, Jens Goebel, Gina Marie Barletta, Denis Geary, David B Kershaw, Cynthia G Pan, Rasheed Gbadegesin, Guillermo Hidalgo, Jerome C Lane, Jeffrey D Leiser, Brett W Plattner, Peter X Song, David Thissen, Yang Liu, Heather E Gross, Darren A DeWalt |
| Abstract |
Nephrotic syndrome (NS) represents a common disease in pediatric nephrology typified by a relapsing and remitting course and characterized by the presence of edema that can significantly affect the health-related quality of life in children and adolescents. The PROMIS pediatric measures were constructed to be publically available, efficient, precise, and valid across a variety of diseases to assess patient reports of symptoms and quality of life. This study was designed to evaluate the ability of children and adolescents with NS to complete the PROMIS assessment via computer and to initiate validity assessments of the short forms and full item banks in pediatric NS. Successful measurement of patient reported outcomes will contribute to our understanding of the impact of NS on children and adolescents. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 28% |
| Psychology | 13 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,164,012
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,125
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,516
of 194,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.