↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive comparison of three different animal models for systemic inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive comparison of three different animal models for systemic inflammation
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12929-017-0370-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Semjon Seemann, Franziska Zohles, Amelie Lupp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 339 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 13%
Researcher 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 106 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 10%
Neuroscience 29 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 7%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 122 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,242,603
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#205
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,142
of 324,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.