↓ Skip to main content

Stakeholder analysis for a maternal and newborn health project in Eastern Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stakeholder analysis for a maternal and newborn health project in Eastern Uganda
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gertrude Namazzi, Kiwanuka Suzanne N, Waiswa Peter, Bua John, Okui Olico, Allen Katharine A, Hyder Adnan A, Ekirapa Kiracho Elizabeth

Abstract

Based on the realization that Uganda is not on track to achieving Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5, Makerere University School of Public Health in collaboration with other partners proposed to conduct two community based maternal/newborn care interventions aimed at increasing access to health facility care through transport vouchers and use of community health workers to promote ideal family care practices. Prior to the implementation, a stakeholder analysis was undertaken to assess and map stakeholders' interests, influence/power and position in relation to the interventions; their views regarding the success and sustainability; and how this research can influence policy formulation in the country.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 308 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 91 29%
Researcher 35 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 59 19%
Unknown 56 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 18%
Social Sciences 39 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 3%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 65 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,703,395
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,292
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,193
of 196,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#24
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.