You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Feeding practices, nutritional status and associated factors of lactating women in Samre Woreda, South Eastern Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-28 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kiday Haileslassie, Afework Mulugeta, Meron Girma |
Abstract |
Lactating mothers from low-income settings are considered as a nutritionally vulnerable group. Due to the nursing process, mothers are subjected to nutritional stresses. Frequent pregnancies followed by lactation increase the health risk of mothers resulting in a high maternal mortality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 526 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 522 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 98 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 52 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 8% |
Researcher | 39 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 39 | 7% |
Other | 79 | 15% |
Unknown | 178 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 94 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 33 | 6% |
Psychology | 11 | 2% |
Other | 49 | 9% |
Unknown | 192 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#12,871,568
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#973
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,738
of 194,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.