↓ Skip to main content

The SAIL databank: linking multiple health and social care datasets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
472 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The SAIL databank: linking multiple health and social care datasets
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-9-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronan A Lyons, Kerina H Jones, Gareth John, Caroline J Brooks, Jean-Philippe Verplancke, David V Ford, Ginevra Brown, Ken Leake

Abstract

Vast amounts of data are collected about patients and service users in the course of health and social care service delivery. Electronic data systems for patient records have the potential to revolutionise service delivery and research. But in order to achieve this, it is essential that the ability to link the data at the individual record level be retained whilst adhering to the principles of information governance. The SAIL (Secure Anonymised Information Linkage) databank has been established using disparate datasets, and over 500 million records from multiple health and social care service providers have been loaded to date, with further growth in progress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 267 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 15%
Student > Master 26 9%
Other 10 4%
Student > Postgraduate 9 3%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 59 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 27%
Computer Science 28 10%
Social Sciences 24 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Psychology 12 4%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 77 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,184,105
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#534
of 2,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,933
of 178,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.