↓ Skip to main content

Mentoring in palliative medicine in the time of covid-19: a systematic scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mentoring in palliative medicine in the time of covid-19: a systematic scoping review
Published in
BMC Medical Education, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12909-022-03409-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sherill Goh, Ruth Si Man Wong, Elaine Li Ying Quah, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Wei Qiang Lim, Aubrey Ding Rui Ng, Xiu Hui Tan, Cheryl Shumin Kow, Yao Hao Teo, Elijah Gin Lim, Anushka Pisupati, Eleanor Jia Xin Chong, Nur Haidah Ahmad Kamal, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Kuang Teck Tay, Yun Ting Ong, Min Chiam, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 24 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 24 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,903,723
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,446
of 3,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,385
of 436,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#69
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.