You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A practical guide for translating in-person simulation curriculum to telesimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-022-00210-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilian Cruz-Panesso, Roger Perron, Valérie Chabot, Frédérique Gauthier, Marie-Michèle Demers, Roxane Trottier, Francis Soulières, Laetitia Juste, Shiva Gharavi, Nathalie MacDonald, Amélie Richard, Audrey Boivin, Benoit Deligne, Karine Bouillon, Pierre Drolet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,338,702
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#199
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,630
of 442,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.