↓ Skip to main content

Recruitment and retention of participants in a pragmatic randomized intervention trial at three community health clinics: Results and lessons learned

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recruitment and retention of participants in a pragmatic randomized intervention trial at three community health clinics: Results and lessons learned
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica T Warner, Russell E Glasgow, Karen M Emmons, Gary G Bennett, Sandy Askew, Bernard Rosner, Graham A Colditz

Abstract

Obesity and hypertension and their associated health complications disproportionately affect communities of color and people of lower socioeconomic status. Recruitment and retention of these populations in research trials, and retention in weight loss trials has been an ongoing challenge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 45 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 15%
Social Sciences 17 10%
Psychology 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 57 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,589,839
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,957
of 14,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,119
of 194,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#33
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.