You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Effects of bowel preparation on intestinal bacterial associated urine and faecal metabolites and the associated faecal microbiome
BMC Gastroenterology, May 2022
Sam T. R. Powles, Kate I. Gallagher, Leo W. L. Chong, James L. Alexander, Benjamin H. Mullish, Lucy C. Hicks, Julie A. K. McDonald, Julian R. Marchesi, Horace R. T. Williams, Timothy R. Orchard
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||13%|
|Student > Postgraduate||1||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||19%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||13%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
of 1,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 442,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.