You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Internet-enabled pulmonary rehabilitation and diabetes education in group settings at home: a preliminary study of patient acceptability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-33 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tatjana M Burkow, Lars K Vognild, Geir Østengen, Elin Johnsen, Marijke Jongsma Risberg, Astrid Bratvold, Tord Hagen, Morten Brattvoll, Trine Krogstad, Audhild Hjalmarsen |
| Abstract |
The prevalence of major chronic illnesses, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes, is increasing. Pulmonary rehabilitation and diabetes self-management education are important in the management of COPD and diabetes respectively. However, not everyone can participate in the programmes offered at a hospital or other central locations, for reasons such as travel and transport. Internet-enabled home-based programmes have the potential to overcome these barriers.This study aims to assess patient acceptability of the delivery form and components of Internet-enabled programmes based on home groups for comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation and for diabetes self-management education. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,339,731
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#601
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,206
of 194,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#18
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.