↓ Skip to main content

Mathematical Models In Biology. 6th edition. Edited by: Leah Eldestein-Keshet

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mathematical Models In Biology. 6th edition. Edited by: Leah Eldestein-Keshet
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, June 2005
DOI 10.1186/1475-925x-4-35
Authors

Giberto Chirico

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#217
of 834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,555
of 57,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.